Skip to content

docs: an oversized upscale is capped, not refused - #68

Merged
a-essawy merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
docs/upscale-capping
Aug 3, 2026
Merged

docs: an oversized upscale is capped, not refused#68
a-essawy merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
docs/upscale-capping

Conversation

@a-essawy

@a-essawy a-essawy commented Aug 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Follows rendobar/rendobar#465 and #467, which changed the behaviour after these docs shipped.

Was: an over-large request failed with VALIDATION_ERROR before the model loaded.

Now: it renders the largest size that fits, keeps the aspect ratio, and logs what it did.

Fixes three stale claims:

  • "the output lands on exactly the size you asked for" was unconditional. It now says "as long as it fits" and links to Size limits.
  • The whole Size limits section described the refusal and its error message. Replaced with the capping behaviour, the real log line, and a note to read output.file.meta rather than assuming the dimensions match the request.
  • Adds that the limit is on output pixels, not on the factor, which is why a 1365x2048 source caps below 2x while a small source reaches 4x. This is the part that confused a real user.

Also documents that seedvr2-7b caps roughly 40% sooner than seedvr2-3b, per the per-checkpoint ceiling in #465.

Validator: 22 files, all valid.

The Size limits section still described the VALIDATION_ERROR that used
to come back. The job now renders the largest size that fits and logs
what it did, so the docs described behaviour that no longer exists.

Also notes that the limit is on output pixels rather than on the factor,
which is what makes a large source cap below 2x, and that the 7B caps
roughly 40% sooner than the 3B.
@a-essawy
a-essawy merged commit 42a9f94 into main Aug 3, 2026
2 checks passed
@a-essawy
a-essawy deleted the docs/upscale-capping branch August 3, 2026 22:24
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant